TROLOLO

Almost all people, as they usually say, physical fitness and sports for health and identified it as the supreme value. But good to know that they have in mind specifically. And then, it turns out, both with happiness and love - when they come, they all immediately recognize, but until then expect, seek, but what exactly can not tell. With his health, however, is not so, and even almost the opposite - when it is, no one notices, but disappears when ... Well, just like children. So why keep something and for that fight? Go to domain search easy

World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. Someone is trying to clarify this definition, supplement, alter, but better, I think they still will not work. This definition is everything. In addition to specific except that. Well, what to take with them? Organization of a world. backaches, and tenderness in the breasts pms symptoms - Premenstrual syndrome

They have a scale! But the presence in this definition, spiritual and social components give it a super price. The fact that all diseases of the nerves heard? This is precisely the spiritual and social, not just the nervous system. But in the spiritual and social well-being lies a little nuances. Maybe if it was a normal person? Especially today. Only idiots and religious fanatics in him. And most people so happy is very rare. What a moment. Maybe in a dream. Well, drunk and eaten. Someone. But the rest of the time life - a struggle where losses more than victories. Especially in sports. So by this definition we age health is not in sight.

There is another approach to the definition of health. Long before the WHO classics of Marxism (and what they all curse?) Was determined as a natural disease in the freedom to life. That is sick, compared with healthy, something like can not. Do you understand? Developing this idea can be very deep to get lost! But using the method of contradiction, health can be viewed as a life free and unconstrained. But is it possible? Around some limitations - and the physical and spiritual, and social. And the laws of nature? How much health here? But the classics were the guys are very clever and cunning. Freedom of something they called the perceived need. You know what that is? This is when you do not what you want, and what we needed and with great pleasure. Moreover. And one might want to only what is necessary. What, eh? But that means that the person so sick and that is somehow constrained in their freedom as simply not aware or does not do consciously what you want. Or aware of, but does not. Or realize that does not do something but does. Or do not know what to do. A lot of ways to help. And so, in practice ...

But you think about a universal method of preventing disease and getting rid of them emerges. Live and do what we need, and you'll be healthy. Vain classics abuse. Nothing wrong with what they say. Perhaps in something and were wrong, but it so brazenly, like many other talkers, especially now, is not lying. But often, and do not themselves have done everything as it should be or how others have learned. And the rest ... And who among us is without sin?

Look also:
Pigs will be cured of diabetes
Sport can restore memory